The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) recently expressed concerns over the fairness and equality of the nomination process in its interim report, noted Stano.

Georgia:Latest Supreme Court appointments R against @osce_odihr, @VeniceComm recommendations, #AprilAgreement & macro-financial assistance conditions. It is missed opportunity 2prove commitment 2genuine reforms of judiciary ?can have only negative impact https://t.co/zv111BPbdS

— Peter Stano (@ExtSpoxEU) July 14, 2021

“The appointments go against key provisions of the April 19 Agreement to pause all ongoing appointments, comply fully with all recommendations made by the Venice Commission, and overall to increase the independence, accountability and quality of the justice system in a broad, inclusive and cross-party reform process. Revising the selection process of Supreme Court judges in line with Venice Commission recommendations before proceeding with appointments is also a mutually agreed condition for the disbursement of the second tranche of EU macro-financial assistance to Georgia under its current programme, which could be negatively affected by this step,” the spokesperson underscored.

EU’s foreign policy spokesperson stressed the vote is a missed opportunity for the Georgian authorities to prove their commitment to genuine and comprehensive reform of the judiciary. EU spokesperson also added that these developments carry a risk of damaging judicial independence and public trust.

“The EU is open to further talks at the highest levels to discuss justice reform and the way ahead following these developments, notably in the context of the April 19 Agreement and decisions regarding EU macro-financial assistance to Georgia,” the spokesperson added.

Georgian Parliament approved six of nine Supreme Court judges on July 12.