“It is unacceptable for an ambassador not to publish a statement, letter, or address, and to create a pretext for speculation,” stated Gia Volski, the First Vice-Speaker of the Parliament. “This behaviour suggests, at the very least, that she does not agree with the policies and directions being implemented by the new U.S. administration.”

According to Volski, the ambassador’s departure from office also reflects the opposition within the United States to the policies pursued by the current administration.

“The resignation of the American ambassador was preceded by a breach of diplomatic ethics, not only towards the host country but also towards the U.S. government itself. It is both impossible and unacceptable for an ambassador to withhold a statement, letter, or address, thereby fueling speculation. Such actions indicate, at least, disagreement with the policies and course set by the new U.S. administration. Naturally, her retirement is also connected to this issue. Typically, ambassadors do not resign prematurely; however, her public statement was appropriate given her responsibilities toward her country.
The fact remains that the opposition in the United States to the policies of the new administration was essentially reflected in her resignation. In any case, there is no other plausible explanation or basis for this decision,” Volski emphasised.

On June 5, Robin Dunnigan announced on social media that she was retiring from her position as the United States Ambassador to Georgia.