This type of law is subjectively never in the interests of any country except for the country where it is in effect. In this case, this law is subjectively in the interests of Georgia only,” Mamuka Mdinaradze, the leader of the parliamentary majority, expressed his views on the draft law on Transparency of Foreign Influence during the plenary.

Mdinaradze further noted that neither opponents nor their partners have provided compelling reasons or arguments as to why the bill is problematic.

“Why do representatives of our partner countries express dissatisfaction with the law? It’s a valid question, even a curious one. Engaging in tough discussions with our friends is a positive step. It is good that the country dares to do so because this has never happened before. Despite such an attitude, we have made significant progress towards European integration. Ultimately, our partners must acknowledge our equality, standing proudly on two legs rather than just one. We overcame all difficulties, as happened in all previous cases. We recall the situation under the previous administration, when the “Natsi” (United National Movement government) were balancing on one leg and where progress towards European integration was hindered. All the progress we’ve made has been during the Georgian Dream period. Why? Because we have proudly and steadfastly defended our principles and national honour, earning respect from both our citizens and international partners.

However, it must be noted that, in this case, despite our boldness, we have not heard from our partners, just like from our opponents, compelling reasons or arguments against the law. This type of law is subjectively never in the interests of any country except the country where it is in effect. In this case, this law is subjectively in the interests of only Georgia. If the only reason is that other countries cannot tell France or the European Union not to accept it. If Georgia turns out to be easily oppressed, then we must consider why so,” Mamuka Mdinaradze concluded.