Girchi: EP resolutions are political statements; enforcement authority lies with European Commission
Girchi: EP resolutions are political statements; enforcement authority lies with European Commission

“I would downplay the significance of the European Parliament’s draft resolution, as it remains merely a draft, and its final version is still uncertain,” stated Herman Sabo, a member of the opposition Girchi party.

He emphasized that resolutions put forth by the European Parliament serve primarily as political statements and do not possess any enforcement mechanism, a power that rests solely with the European Commission.

“If I wished to, I could easily rally 10 to 15 deputies in the European Parliament who are sympathetic to Girchi to pass a resolution. However, I do not consider that to be serious, as some of the issues are unrelated. For instance, I agree with certain elements, such as the sanctions. We are significantly tied to military sanctions. Georgia’s commitment to these sanctions may come under scrutiny, particularly regarding financial matters, especially since the government has established a backdoor that requires local court approval for any financial sanctions imposed by Europe or the U.S. While this may be perceived as a backdoor in Europe if they request its removal, it could become a subject of political negotiation. Nevertheless, we should refrain from joining in on any additional sanctions. Many political groups within the European Union are capable of organizing such initiatives,” Sabo added.

The draft resolution, titled “On Democratic Backsliding and Threats to Political Pluralism in Georgia,” calls for sanctions against Russia, sanctions against Ivanishvili and other individuals, the release of Saakashvili, and the repeal of the Family Values Law.